Simon Swan, co-founder and CEO of Hiring Hub, suggested it reflected a “culture of compromise” where time and market pressures have meant companies were not appointing individuals who were best suited to the role.He feels HR professionals and business owners have begun to “compromise on recruitment quality almost as a matter of routine”. The top three negative consequences of hiring the wrong employee were the need to invest further in developing new recruits (54 per cent mentioned this as an issue), an impact on company performance, and line managers needing to spend more time supporting new recruits. Hiring Hub conducted the study of 200 HR professionals and business owners responsible for the hiring processes within their organisations, to question their approach to recruitment. Swan said a vicious circle had developed where UK businesses “waste the little time they do have in finding a candidate they then have to replace – or dedicate more time line-managing in the long run”.
The study indicated that over a third of those hiring were feeling the pressure more so in 2015 than a year ago and were compromising more on candidates as a result. Allocation of time was considered a particular point of concern, as over half said they spent more time vetting CVs and briefing recruitment agencies than interviewing candidates – working out at over eight million hours of time spent recruiting for roles. The areas employers tended to compromise most on were qualifications or skills (37 per cent agreed on this) and personality, attitude or cultural fit (36 per cent) – which has often been cited as an area of particular importance to small businesses. Some 35 per cent mentioned relevant past experience as an area that ended up being compromised on, while a fifth mentioned salary or benefits. Read more on recruitment:
- Digital disruption hits recruitment at last
- SMEs need to invest more time and effort to get the best directors
- Will PwC’s scrapping of A-level criteria lead other employers to follow suit?
Share this story