
With the Olympics only a year away, the new sport that continues to thrive is bank bashing.
Both SMEs and the media continue to attack the banks for their failure to lend and for their lack of support during the recession. But most of these issues are focused on banks lending in traditional forms, via overdrafts or loans. Without sufficient security from the business or its directors, the banks have found it hard to lend. The EFG scheme has gone some way to dealing with this issue but that has been plagued with its own bad press.- The facility is linked to sales and not the balance sheet or performance of the business. As sales increase the facility is flexible and will grow with the business.
- The facility will be contracted for a fixed period giving a business stability unlike an overdraft which is always repayable on demand.
- The perceived risk of the facility to the lender is much lower, as borrowing is secured against an asset (the sales invoice). This results in a reduced level of security when compared with the requirements for an overdraft.
- ABL facilities can be approved in a matter of days and implemented very quickly, in most cases far quicker than an overdraft with its security requirements.
- Although the total charges on an ABL facility may be higher than an overdraft most businesses are convinced that the level of flexibility and reduced security requirements are valuable benefits, worth paying for.
Share this story