In a partnership two businesses have decided that it will be mutually beneficial to?collaborate in order to grow both companies. The mutuality aspect is obvious at the outset?but often becomes lost as time goes on. This challenge is often exacerbated when one?company is significantly larger than the other because what is seen as acceptable growth?may differ on either side of the relationship. Where a large manufacturer is concerned that?the distributor is not capable of growing at the pace required all too often decisions are?made to side-line or even drop the partner and this may eventually prove to be mistaken.?Smaller distributors offer a number of valuable aspects to any network including loyalty,?innovation and market intelligence. Using a smaller distributor means that the?manufacturer represents a significant proportion of their turnover and this in effect means?that they will act almost as a de facto subsidiary: holding cushion stocks, buying early etc.?Therefore, taking the decision to side-line or cut such a partner is risky. The larger dealer who might be considered as a replacement will not display the above?behaviour and in fact it is quite common for the role to be reversed and the manufacturer is?asked to dance to the tune of the dealer. In the final analysis the manufacturer needs to?know that the majority of the relationships within its global sales network are solid and will?hold in good times and bad, otherwise the validity of longer term planning is suspect. I mentioned innovation and this is a huge benefit of good partnership. The “Lead User”?concept (pioneered by companies such as 3M) states that the people who best know your?products are the end-users and that you should seek out leading examples to road test new?concepts as part of your R&D programme. This is fascinating and will be dealt with in a later?post. At this stage we need to simply recognise that the lead users are customers of your?distributor and committed partners will be motivated to reach out to such leaders to initiate?projects with your products to try to better fit the benefits into the local context. Read more about partnerships:
Sales are?always “local” at the end of the day and many companies fail to properly recognise and act?on that concept. The local distributor is your representative in front of the end users and?can directly affect the success of your products therefore. As the dealers come to?understand the mode of action of your technologies better they can even propose new?formulations or blends of products or indeed new applications. Once you reach that level?(let?s call it Top Level) the partnership has become more than the sum of its parts and offers?true value to both parties. A CEO once said to me that if you need to write a distribution agreement then that is the?end of the partnership. Whilst I fully understand the sentiment behind the statement,?agreements are necessary and offer a degree of certainty to both parties that is important?for planning. That said, where a top level partnership exists a large degree of flexibility?should be exercised when interpreting recent performance compared to the text of the?document. “No plan survives contact with the enemy” is a paraphrase from Field Marshall?Helmuth von Moltke that has been reinterpreted many times over the years since and is?extremely relevant to any budget or business plan today. Even the best, most committed?partner may have challenging years often for reasons beyond its control and true?partnership behaviour demands that empathy is shown at that time. Indeed where top level partnership exists, a bad year will not come as a shock in month?12 because constant, honest feedback will have been forthcoming throughout the year.?Such feedback allows for adjustment of forecasts and perhaps redistribution of resources to?other markets to help compensate for the lost performance. Just as with any other?relationship in life, the successful riding of a storm often strengthens the bond and makes?the partnership even more powerful going forward. Most distribution bosses are continually concerned that the manufacturer will eventually look to?sell direct in the market and cut them out. This in my opinion will later be seen as a mistake?more often than not. Manufacturers must recognise the value that local dealers offer;?fundamentally in the goodwill that they have earned over many years and also the risks that?they take ? with payment from end-users, for example. All this will land in the lap of the?manufacturer once the decision is made to go direct. Not to mention the fixed costs that?will now be required for local staff and facilities. Overall, growth via a network of loyal, top level partners is less risky and more reliable and?therefore should form an important part of most business strategies. Andrew Low, who has?26 years in the Agri-business sector,?is managing director of?JE Invest?and the owner?of?DiscussingBusiness.com.?Image: Shutterstock
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.