Why? It is, firstly, a salutary reminder of the very existence of the CMA, a fact of which some businesses are not yet fully aware? which is not altogether surprising, for the CMA ? the Competition and Markets Authority, a non-ministerial department ? has been fully operative for less than a year. Indeed, it was only this April that it assumed the functions of the Competition Commission, and most of the functions of the Office of Fair Trading, so it is still relatively a new kid on the block. But the kid definitely has a spring in its step, and all the indications are that it will be more gung-ho than its predecessors. Even if unfamiliar today, the initials ‘CMA’ will become well known to British business as time goes by. Secondly, it demonstrates the very wide remit that the CMA holds. Unlike sectoral regulators, its gaze extends right across the board, for it is charged with (among other things) investigating and enforcing competition law across the spectrum of commerce and industry. Over the past few months its beady eye has fallen not just on bankers, but on a range of other industries from commercial caterers to online hotel booking companies to bathroom fitters. And the powers granted to it under the Competition Act 1998 are sweeping, from executing dawn raids to imposing fines on malefactors of up to an eye-watering ten per cent of turnover. Thirdly, it illustrates how bundling can contravene competition law. ‘Bundling’ is the colloquial shorthand for what the Competition Act long-windedly describes as making ‘the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts’ ? a practice which (unless one of the applicable exemptions applies) can all too easily break the law.? In this respect the CMA recently concluded that both HSBC and First Trust Bank had been indicating to various SMEs that opening an account with them was a condition for obtaining a business loan? which was particularly remiss, as those banks had already given legally-binding undertakings not to repeat this practice.? If one gives an undertaking to a competition law regulator, it is (to say the least) prudent to abide by it! Businesses who are having trouble with their banks have reason to hope for more good news from the CMA, which has recently announced a market investigation into the supply of personal current accounts and of banking services to SMEs. And, in the meantime, those who are tempted to do a bit of bundling should think twice, for there is a sharp-eyed watchdog at large that dislikes the practice. Jonathan Cornthwaiteu2028 is partneru2028 at Wedlake Bell LLP.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.