The office…At its worst, the office, with its layers of bureaucracy, unofficial rules and lines of management can be a petri-dish of negative power relations, ultimately affecting the mental health of the employees working there. However, by identifying what these forms of power are in any particular workplace, they can be discussed and dismantled to create a more positive work environment where employees are relaxed, happier and more productive. To start, let’s address the first toxic manifestation of power relations in the office – presenteeism.
1. PresenteeismPresenteeism is the idea that one must stay in the office and work beyond contracted hours in order to ‘get ahead’ in their career. Staff commonly feel a need to ‘be seen,’, because if they’re not seen, they’re not working or progressing. Feeling watched and judged by other colleagues, they resolve to stay on with them, (ergo – discursive power relations). If the numbers of ‘presenteeists’ grow, the rest of the team will feel pressured to do the same.
* Self-inflicted disciplineUnless a manager or the ‘boss’ pull an employee aside for a last-minute and urgent task, an employee’s decision to stay working late just to ‘look good’ to others is exemplary of how dangerous discursive power relations can be.
* Insecurity and eventual defeatUnsurprisingly, presenteeism can lead to widespread office stress and burnout among staff. This makes it a ‘perfect storm’ for mental health issues to brew and take hold, leading to escalating absence rates and high staff turnover where employees would rather leave a role than challenge a seemingly absolutist work culture.
2. Mind gamesIn his works, Foucault also references his theory of ‘‘Sovereign Power’, which can be seen in office environments and commonly in the relationships between a business owner and CEO, their managers, and the rest of the team. An example of when a business owner or senior staff can use their ‘sovereign’ power in a harmful way is when they make something called ‘a power move’ – which is just to show an employee that they’re capable of exerting authority due to their senior position.
* Exerting ‘authority’ for the sake of itWhen this power isn’t employed to aid in a business situation to help or to discipline an employee for a valid reason, it’s really just being done for the ‘ego’, which can be deeply mentally unsettling for the recipient. This can include ‘snapping’ at staff just because the person has ‘the authority’ to do so, or constantly ‘checking up’ on them to see if they’re working at certain hours of the day, (micromanaging).
* Staff won’t be able to lie about your reputationThis will affect the mental health of the employee on the receiving end of the exchange in some way, making them feel belittled and infantilised – or even worse, paranoid and stressed. Playing these sorts of mind games with staff will only leave you with the reputation as a ‘little Hitler’ type. Be assured that when this reputation takes hold, it will be translated to prospective recruits during interview processes when they ask your managers what you’re like to work under. Even if nothing’s said, recruits will read between the lines.
3. Office politicsWhere you have a group of people and their respective ambitions in one room, you’re going to get some office politics, and they can be negative and can be anything from office cliques to ‘backstabbing’ colleagues. For example, is there an employee in your office who offers praise and support to a colleague, only to descend into bitching about them minutes later? Then you’ve got some toxic office politics going on.
* Shut down gossipStopping employee backstabbing and unhealthy competition means shutting down gossip and a ‘Chinese whispers’ culture as soon as it occurs. If a manager or another staff member has genuine concerns about a certain colleague’s ability to undertake their job, this must only be discussed with a line manager in a private setting, and not with random members of the team for cheap thrills.
* Having ‘the ear of the king’Maybe there’s a certain manager that everyone knows ‘has the ear’ of the boss. Again, this is where Foucault’s ideas come into play. X person has the influence, so every other team member must try and get in favour with X in order to get in favour with the boss, Y. What can also come from this is a culture of what Foucault calls prohibition and discipline, where staff members are afraid to speak candidly about an employer in the office should the favoured X tell the boss about it.
* Create a democracy, not a dictatorshipEmployees do have the right to have open (but still respectful) conversations about an employer’s strategy should it be giving them genuine concern in relation to the ongoing success of a business. Creating a culture where no one can speak against an employer for any reason creates a dictatorial and repressive environment which can make it a toxic, intimidating and a mentally unhealthy one to work in.
Share this story