1. All businesses are under a moral and legal obligation to pay the right amount of taxNo, they’re not. There is no such thing as the “right amount of tax” any more than there is the “right price” for any other supply of goods and services. It is for Parliament to legislate the tax system and it is the duty of all businesses to contribute in accordance with the law. It is not for taxpayers to set the amount of tax they pay – therein lies the path to anarchy.
2. Tax avoidance is illegalNo, it’s not. Sometimes, journalists mention that tax avoidance is not actually illegal but this is often buried in the small print towards the end of an article urging various celebrities to be treated with pariah status. In many cases, the practice indulged in is not only not illegal but may actually be strictly in accordance with the legislation. HMRC find current legislation increasingly difficult to apply correctly as it is becoming more extensive and arcane. There are some schemes that haven’t even come to court yet that could be found in favour of the taxpayer. Isn’t this akin to a headline “famous celebrity caught for driving at 29 mph in a 30 zone”?
3. Participating in an avoidance scheme that doesn’t work is illegalNo, again. It may not work and may cost a lot of money but it’s not illegal.
4. There is no difference between tax avoidance and tax evasionOh too easy. Yes, there is. Even the man on the Clapham omnibus knows this one, doesn’t he? Tax evasion is illegal and rightly so. It can also lead to criminal prosecution. But there is a huge difference between failing to declare income on the one hand and, on the other, telling HMRC all about a tax arrangement and entering into a genuine dispute with HMRC as to the tax effects. If the Government doesn’t like a “scheme”, then it has the right to legislate against it. That is completely different from allowing HMRC to interpret the law in any way they wish.
5. Huge multinational corporations should be forced to pay tax in the countries in which they do businessThey already are. It’s called VAT.
6. Engaging in aggressive tax planning is the moral equivalent of violent crimeNo, it’s not. But to read some of the more lurid reporting from newspapers who really ought to know better, one could forgive the reader from becoming confused. Try this from no less than The Times: “George Michael, four members of Arctic Monkeys, Sir Michael Caine and a loan shark convicted of rape are among more than 1,600 people who tried to shelter £1.2bn through one of Britain’s most aggressive tax avoidance schemes”. What is the relevance of the fact that one of the members of the Liberty tax scheme was a loan shark convicted of rape? Is the intention to imply that such an individual is the “type” that would engage in tax avoidance? Let’s change the sentence slightly to expose it for the lazy journalism that it is: “George Michael, four members of Arctic Monkeys, Sir Michael Caine and a model railway enthusiast are among more than 1,600 people who tried to shelter £1.2bn through one of Britain’s most aggressive tax avoidance schemes.” Does that say something about model railway enthusiasts? Image source
Share this story