Last week, the CBI said that all listed companies should set their own targets for improving the number of females at board level. In its submission to Lord Davies of Abersoch, who is carrying out a review for the government on the lack of female directors, the employer’s group said that companies would have to report on progress against internally set targets and explain if they failed to deliver.
But will this actually work? The “comply or explain” model sounds like a bit of a cop out to me. If companies fail to meet their declared levels, they’ll have to explain why (oooh, big deal) but they won’t face any penalties. The proportion of women on FTSE 100 boards has, rather dismally, plateaued at 12.5 per cent. We’ve been grappling with this issue of female representation for years. Isn’t about time the government did something… dare we say it… daring? The CBI’s report rejected legal quotas – but they’ve worked a treat in Norway. Ansgar Gabrielsen, Norway’s former trade and industry minister, proposed quotas back in 2002 – to cries of discontent. His law, which would require 40 per cent of all company board members to be women, seemed like a radical and preposterous move. At the time, Norwegian women held less than seven per cent of private-sector board seats; just under five per cent of chief executives were women. After months of dispute, the measure was approved in Parliament, giving state-owned companies until 2006 to comply and publicly listed companies until 2008. The quotas have forced real change. The share of female directors at the roughly 400 companies affected is above 40 per cent, while women fill more than a quarter of the board seats at the 65 largest privately held companies. Sure, there are flaws in the system. The surge in female directors hasn’t yet brought any real rise in the number of women chief execs in the country. And there have been no noticeable improvements in corporate performance. But it’s a positive start. According to a piece in the NY Times, when Norway first made its case for quotas, the number of women on boards had been growing by less than one per cent a year for a decade. At that rate of growth, it would have taken 200 years to reach 40 per cent. Forced diversity isn’t the best solution for British business – but do we really want to wait 200 years for boardroom equality here in the UK? Seriously? Picture source
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.