It is widely accepted that the implementation of MAR was rushed, a point which was made to the European Commission. It was only in April when the Financial Conduct Authority (the FCA) formally advised that it would be withdrawing the Model Code for share dealing and the statutory instrument to remove the former regime was only passed a few days before the deadline.Key provisions of the Market Abuse Regulation as applied in the UK MAR has an impact on financial instruments admitted to trading on regulated markets in the EU and issuers with financial instruments admitted to trading on multilateral trading facilities and organised trading facilities as defined in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II). Certain aspects of MAR implementation have been rendered more complex by the twelve month implementation delay to MiFID II (principally caused by a lack of preparedness within the regulatory bodies and the EU institutions). The rules in relation to insider lists have become more prescriptive and additional administration is now needed. Transactions by persons discharging managerial responsibilities (PDMRs) PDMRs and persons closely associated with them must now notify the issuer and the FCA by T+3 of their dealings valued in excess of EUR 5,000 in any calendar year in or related to the issuer’s securities. It is important to carefully analyse if you are a person closely associated with a PDMR. The Governance Institute, the Quoted Companies Alliance and GC100 were left with little time to produce the new sample dealing code and policy document, which helpfully addresses the relevant issues for both LSE Main Market and AIM companies. However, the new industry-led dealing code does not address the position of companies with equity securities admitted to trading on the two ISDX markets or elsewhere. The presumption is not to deal in company securities, unless an exception applies. Delayed disclosure of inside information under MAR MAR has introduced to the UK a new concept, which was previously very rare, namely a regime which contemplates possibility of delayed announcement of price sensitive information to market. Previously, it was necessary to announce “without delay”.
If, in the unlikely event that an announcement has been delayed, the issuer must notify the FCA of such fact in a prescribed form as soon as the market announcement is eventually made and will then need to give a further written explanation if requested. It is notable that there is no need to set out reasons for the delay on the form. An emergency line is available for financial and credit institutions to requesting FCA advance consent to delay disclosure of inside information due to financial stability concerns. Read more articles on legal issues:
- How well do you know the whistleblowing policy?
- The five times businesses were forced to change names
- Legal issues for UK businesses collaborating with the US
Share this story